Pellet Weighing - Accuracy Tests

Part II: Effect of weight variation on POI.
by Asa
www.pellet-perfect.com 

In the previous post we saw evidence that many pellet brands show a considerable variation in pellet weights from their published weight.

The big question still remains: What variation in the weight of a pellet causes a noticeable difference in its POI (point of impact) at the ranges that it will be commonly used?

The variation that we are interested in is the elevation of the POI and not so much the lateral variation.

The ranges that are going to show the significant variations, if any, are the longest that sub 12ftlb rifles are generally used at ie: 45yds to 55yds.

Of course the veracity of any data gathered from this test is dependent on whether the pellets used are ones which the test gun “likes” – by that I mean that whatever the quality control in manufacture and design of the pellet it may not produce consistent results out of all guns - it has been the experience of many shooters that even the same make and model of gun does not favour the same pellet.

The rifle used for the testing is an unmodified HW100 .177 with a Deben 4-12x44 AO scope.  Not really enough magnification to see what’s going on at 55yds but hopefully with a bench rest the results will be consistent enough.
This HW100 achieves good results with JSB Exact 4.52mm so that is the pellet selected for the tests.

These tests were done outside using a Buffalo River Bench Rest.
(The target is called “holdover”, designed by Mike Chapman)
The horizontal marker lines on the target are 1/4"inch apart.
5 shot groups were used.

Starting out using the 1/10th grain groups of pellet weights as in the weight tests (see previous post). For the JSB EXACT these ranged from 8.20gr to 8.70gr.  I shot groups at 45, 50 and 55yds.  However, the groups at 50 and 55yds were disappointing but showed enough of a variation to keep me interested and so I decided to narrow the weight ranges further and have the groups more distinct in weight. So the new weight groups were (in grains):
8.24 to 8.29
8.30 to 8.35
8.40 to 8.45
8.50 to 8.55
8.60 to 8.65
I then shot groups at the same ranges again.

Here are the results:





At a glance, the elevation of the POI clearly varies according to the weight, as we would expect, but the question remains: is the variation shown here “significant”.  That of course depends on what you want to do…

The total range of elevation for all the pellet weights tested, ie: as if pellets were taken straight from the tin, considering that each horizontal marker on the target is a ¼ inch/ 6mm, is as follows:

45yds = 1 in       / 25mm
50yds = 1 ½ in   / 38mm
55yds = 1 ¾ in   / 44mm


Against the average size of the groups achieved after weighing and grouping by weight, ie: as if the zero were adjusted according to the exact weight of each pellet:

45yds = 3/5th in          / 15mm
50yds = 4/5th in          / 21mm
55yds = 4/5th in          / 20mm


What these figures seem to indicate is that at up to 45yds, a group straight from the tin is very acceptable, so fine for HFT and hunting up to this range. But as soon as the range exceeds 45yds the groups we can expect direct from the tin are far less convincing and suggest that for consistent grouping from 45 to 55yds in this case weighing pellets is advisable.

Final Conclusions:
Although this could be viewed simply as a test of JSB EXACT and not representing a general rule that can be applied to all pellets, if your chosen pellet does show a weight variation of over about 3.5% (see previous post) and if you want to get the most out of your gun at longer ranges then weighing pellets is going to help you achieve it.





copywright Asa Goldschmied
www.pellet-perfect.com

Pellet Weighing – Is it worth it?


PART I - Weight variation out of the tin. 
By Asa
 
Huddled over a set of scales the night before a competition, examining and weighing your tried and tested pellets - essential for achieving you best score or just sad...?
 
I wanted to have a go at proving whether sorting pellets by weight is actually going to be helpful or just a way of passing the time when we can't be out shooting.

So, first of all I have set out to weigh at least a hundred of as many makes of pellet as I can in order to establish the spread of weights and extremes of weight that you are likely to have in your tin.

Rather than record the weight of every single pellet to 100th of a grain, to save time I sorted the pellets into 10th of a grain groups and plotted the results on the graphs below.  As you will see each coloured bar represents the number of pellets that fell into any given 1/10th grain bracket ie: in the JSB Exact .177 graph: 32 pellets weighed between 8.30 and 8.39 grains (orange bar).  The figure on top of each bar represents the number of pellets in each bracket as a percentage of all the pellets weighed, so in this case 32 pellets was 29.91% of all the JSB Exacts that I weighed.
 
 
These are the pellets tested in .177 from samples of at least 100 pellets:

JSB Exact
Air arms Field
H&N F&TT
H&N F&TT Green
Pax Defiant
Daystate Rangemaster
Webley Mosquito Express
Daystate FT    
Bisley Magnum
Pax Thunderbolt
RWS Superfield 
Crosman Premier 7.9gr
Crosman Premier 10.5gr

 
   
The JSB Exact with a published weight of 8.44gr showed a heaviest pellet at 8.63gr and lightest at 8.24gr which is a difference of 0.29gr which represents a 3.5% variation in the pellet weights.
 
 
 
 
 
The Air Arms Field with a published weight of 8.44gr showed a heaviest pellet at 8.63gr and lightest at 8.27gr which is a difference of 0.36gr which represents a 4% variation in the pellet weights.
 
  


 
The H&N F&TT – published weight 8.5gr - showed a heaviest pellet at 8.65gr and lightest at 8.48gr which is a difference of 0.17gr which represents a 2% variation in the pellet weights.
 

 
   
 
The H&N F&TT Green – published weight 5.56gr, showed a heaviest pellet at 5.65gr and lightest at 5.55gr which is a difference of 0.1gr which represents a 1.8% variation in the pellet weights.

 
 
 
 
The Defiant showed a heaviest pellet at 7.62gr and lightest at 7.39gr which is a difference of 0.23gr which represents a 3% variation in the pellet weights.
 
 
 
 
 
The Daystate Rangemaster showed a heaviest pellet at 8.52gr and lightest at 8.43gr which is a difference of 0.09gr which represents a 1% variation in the pellet weights.
 







The Webley Mosquito Express with a published weight of 7.9gr showed a heaviest pellet at 7.99gr and lightest at 7.70gr which is a difference of 0.29gr which represents a 3.7% variation in the pellet weights.
 
  
 
  
The Daystate FT showed a heaviest pellet at 8.63gr and lightest at 8.24gr which is a difference of 0.39gr which represents a 4.6% variation in the pellet weights.
 
 
 
 
 
 The Bisley Magnum showed a heaviest pellet at 10.25gr and lightest at 10.02gr which is a difference of 0.23gr which represents a 2.3% variation in the pellet weights.
 



This zinc super lightweight pellet from Pax, the Thunderbolt, published weight of 5gr, showed a heaviest pellet at 5.02gr and lightest at 4.95gr which is a difference of 0.05gr which represents a 1.4% variation in the pellet weights.
 



  

The RWS Superfield with a published weight of 8.4gr showed a heaviest pellet at 8.64gr and lightest at 8.32gr which is a difference of 0.32gr which represents a 3.8% variation in the pellet weights.
 
  



The Crosman Premier 7.9gr  showed a heaviest pellet at 8.07gr and lightest at 7.76gr which is a difference of 0.31gr which represents a 3.9% variation in the pellet weights.






The Crosman Premier 10.5gr showed a heaviest pellet at 10.70gr and lightest at 10.19gr which is a difference of 0.51gr which represents a 4.8% variation in the pellet weights.




 
What does the % variation figure tell us:
 
The % variation figures give us a measure of the range of weights that you could expect to find in any given tin of pellets as a percentage of the weight of the pellet in question. It is a measure of the consistency of manufacture but not necessarily a measure of how “good” a pellet is overall. It is only part of the picture.
 
However, % variation is potentially very useful because it tells us if there is a possibility that one or two much lighter or heavier pellets are lurking somewhere in your tin. So if they do prove to be significantly different enough in weight to effect the accuracy, then that is important and would justify getting out the scales!

 
The question now is: does it make any difference to accuracy? 
Next is some testing to see how much, if at all, these levels of weight variation effect the consistency of a pellet.
 
I attempt to answer this by carrying out accuracy tests at different ranges using any given pellet in their 1/10th grain groups.  If there are going to be differences due to weight they will probably only start to be significant at the extremes of range, so for sub 12ftib rifles I test at 45yds and 55yds.
 
Results coming soon!



copywright Asa Goldschmied
www.pellet-perfect.com